Early Access and Crowdfunding

Early Access and crowdfunding represent transformative monetization strategies that have fundamentally altered the game development landscape by enabling developers to secure funding and validate concepts before full release ¹³. These approaches allow studios to generate revenue during development while simultaneously building engaged communities that contribute feedback, shaping the final product ⁵⁸. Early Access typically involves selling unfinished games through digital distribution platforms like Steam, while crowdfunding leverages platforms such as Kickstarter to raise capital from prospective players in exchange for future rewards ²³. These strategies matter profoundly because they democratize game development financing, reduce publisher dependency, mitigate financial risk, and create sustainable development cycles particularly beneficial for independent studios lacking traditional funding sources ⁹¹⁰.

Overview

The emergence of Early Access and crowdfunding as viable monetization strategies reflects fundamental shifts in both technology and developer-player relationships. Early Access gained formal recognition when Steam introduced its Early Access program in 2013, establishing a structured framework for what had previously been informal beta testing arrangements ⁴⁵. Crowdfunding for games gained momentum following the spectacular success of projects like Double Fine Adventure (later Broken Age) in 2012, which raised over $3 million and demonstrated that players would financially support game development directly ⁹.

These models emerged to address a critical challenge in game development: the difficulty independent and mid-sized studios faced in securing traditional publisher funding, particularly for innovative or niche concepts that didn't fit established market formulas ³¹⁰. Traditional publishing relationships often required developers to surrender creative control and substantial revenue shares, while also limiting opportunities for experimental gameplay or underserved genres ⁹. Early Access and crowdfunding offered alternatives that allowed developers to maintain creative vision while accessing capital and market validation.

The practice has evolved significantly since its inception. Initial crowdfunding campaigns often featured ambitious promises and unrealistic timelines, leading to high-profile failures and delays that damaged platform credibility ⁷. Similarly, early Steam Early Access releases sometimes resulted in abandoned projects or perpetual development cycles ¹². These challenges prompted platform policy refinements, community expectation adjustments, and developer professionalization around transparency and project management ⁵¹¹. Contemporary implementations increasingly emphasize realistic scoping, regular communication, and hybrid funding approaches that combine multiple revenue streams ⁸¹⁰.

Key Concepts

Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

The Minimum Viable Product represents the smallest feature set that delivers core gameplay value sufficient to justify purchase while demonstrating the game's potential ¹¹¹. In Early Access and crowdfunding contexts, the MVP typically represents 30-50% of planned features, focusing on functional core mechanics rather than content breadth. This concept differs from traditional beta testing by emphasizing commercial viability rather than mere technical functionality.

Example: When Supergiant Games launched Hades into Early Access, their MVP included the complete core roguelike loop—procedurally generated runs through the underworld, combat mechanics, progression systems, and narrative framework—but featured only the first biome fully developed. This allowed players to experience the fundamental gameplay that would define the final product while clearly indicating substantial content remained in development. The approach generated revenue while providing a solid foundation for iterative refinement based on player feedback ⁶.

Stretch Goals

Stretch goals are additional funding targets beyond the initial campaign goal that unlock enhanced features, expanded content, or improved production values ²³. These create momentum during crowdfunding campaigns by providing ongoing incentives for increased backing and social sharing. Stretch goals serve dual purposes: demonstrating development ambition and creating psychological investment through participatory goal achievement.

Example: Divinity: Original Sin 2's Kickstarter campaign established an initial goal of $500,000 but included stretch goals reaching $2 million that unlocked additional races, expanded storylines, enhanced orchestral soundtracks, and console ports. Each achieved milestone generated renewed media coverage and backer enthusiasm, ultimately raising over $2 million and funding features that contributed to the game's critical acclaim and commercial success exceeding 3 million copies sold ⁸.

Reward Tiers

Reward tiers create graduated incentive structures in crowdfunding campaigns, offering increasing benefits at higher contribution levels ²³. These typically range from basic game copies ($15-30) through collector's editions with digital bonuses ($60-100) to premium experiences including physical merchandise, design input, or personalized content ($250+). Effective tier structures balance perceived value against fulfillment costs and complexity.

Example: The Kickstarter campaign for Pathfinder: Kingmaker structured tiers from $28 (digital game copy) through $75 (digital deluxe edition with soundtrack and artbook) to $250 (physical collector's edition with cloth map and miniature) and $5,000 (custom portrait and NPC designed with developer input). This structure generated $909,057 from 18,351 backers, with the majority selecting mid-tier options that maximized revenue while minimizing complex fulfillment requirements ⁸.

Community Feedback Integration

Community feedback integration transforms player input into actionable development priorities through systematic collection, analysis, and implementation processes ¹⁵. This distinguishes Early Access and crowdfunding from traditional development by making community participation a core development methodology rather than peripheral market research. Effective integration requires infrastructure for feedback collection, prioritization frameworks, and transparent communication about implementation decisions.

Example: Factorio's development team maintained detailed public roadmaps, weekly development blogs called "Friday Facts," and active forum engagement throughout their multi-year Early Access period. They systematically categorized community suggestions, publicly discussed technical feasibility and design implications, and regularly released updates demonstrating implemented feedback. This approach built exceptional community trust, contributing to the game's overwhelmingly positive Steam reviews (98% positive from over 100,000 reviews) and sales exceeding 3.5 million copies ⁶.

Development Transparency

Development transparency involves regular, honest communication about progress, challenges, and decision-making processes ⁵⁸¹¹. This includes development blogs, financial reporting, milestone tracking, and candid discussion of setbacks. Transparency builds trust that justifies the inherent risk in pre-release monetization, transforming potential skepticism into collaborative patience.

Example: When Hollow Knight's development extended beyond initial Kickstarter timelines, Team Cherry maintained monthly backer updates detailing specific progress on areas, mechanics, and art assets while honestly acknowledging scope expansion and timeline adjustments. They shared work-in-progress screenshots, discussed design challenges, and explained why certain features required more development time than anticipated. This transparency preserved backer goodwill despite delays, and the final product's exceptional quality (over 3 million copies sold, 97% positive Steam reviews) validated the extended development ⁶⁹.

Hybrid Funding Models

Hybrid funding models combine multiple monetization approaches—typically crowdfunding for initial capital followed by Early Access for sustained development funding ⁸¹⁰. This strategy maximizes capital access while building community across multiple platforms and engagement points, reducing dependency on any single funding source and providing financial flexibility for scope adjustments.

Example: Pathfinder: Kingmaker launched a Kickstarter campaign that raised $909,057, providing initial development capital and market validation. Following successful funding, the developers transitioned to Early Access on Steam and GOG, generating additional revenue during the extended development period while incorporating feedback from both backer communities and Early Access purchasers. This hybrid approach funded development through completion while building a substantial player base before full release ⁸.

Risk Distribution

Risk distribution refers to spreading financial and development risk across numerous backers or early purchasers rather than concentrating it on publishers or studios ³¹¹. This enables higher-risk innovation and niche projects but also transfers some failure consequences to consumers, creating ethical considerations regarding incomplete or abandoned projects.

Example: When Double Fine Adventure (Broken Age) raised $3.3 million against a $400,000 goal, the expanded scope created development challenges that required additional funding through Early Access sales of Act 1 to complete Act 2. While some backers criticized the approach, the risk distribution model meant that no single publisher bore catastrophic losses, the studio maintained creative control, and the project ultimately completed despite challenges—an outcome less likely under traditional publishing where scope overruns might have resulted in cancellation ⁹.

Applications in Game Development Contexts

Independent Studio Financing

Independent studios with limited capital access use Early Access and crowdfunding as primary financing mechanisms, replacing traditional publisher relationships ¹⁰. This application proves particularly valuable for teams with proven track records but unconventional concepts that publishers might reject as commercially risky.

Supergiant Games, despite previous successes with Bastion and Transistor, chose Early Access for Hades to fund extended development while maintaining complete creative control. The Early Access period generated revenue supporting two years of development, allowed extensive balance refinement for the roguelike systems, and built a dedicated community that provided day-one momentum for the 1.0 release. The game ultimately won numerous Game of the Year awards and sold over 1 million copies, demonstrating how established indies use these models strategically rather than desperately ⁶.

Niche Genre Validation

Developers targeting underserved genres or audiences use crowdfunding to validate market demand before committing full development resources ²³. This application reduces the risk of investing years in projects that might lack sufficient audience, while simultaneously building that audience through campaign participation.

Larian Studios used Kickstarter for Divinity: Original Sin 2 despite having publisher options, specifically to validate demand for a complex, old-school CRPG in a market dominated by action-oriented titles. The campaign's success ($2 million raised) demonstrated substantial appetite for the genre, justified the multi-year development investment, and built a community of 42,713 backers who became evangelists for the final product. The validation proved accurate—the game achieved critical acclaim and commercial success that exceeded publisher projections ⁸.

Live Service Foundation Building

Games planning ongoing content updates and live service models use Early Access to establish engaged communities and refine core systems before transitioning to live operations ⁵¹⁰. This application creates smooth progression from development to service operation while building the player base necessary for sustainable live service economics.

Dead Cells entered Early Access with core roguelike mechanics functional but limited content, then spent a year incorporating community feedback while regularly adding new weapons, enemies, and biomes. This approach refined the gameplay loop to exceptional quality while building a community invested in the game's success. Upon 1.0 release, the established player base and positive word-of-mouth drove sales exceeding 5 million copies, supporting ongoing free content updates and paid DLC that sustained engagement for years ⁶.

Prototype-to-Production Transition

Studios use crowdfunding to transition promising prototypes into full production by demonstrating market viability to secure additional funding or justify internal resource allocation ³⁹. This application bridges the gap between concept validation and production-scale investment.

Hollow Knight began as a small prototype by a three-person team with limited resources. Their Kickstarter campaign sought modest funding (AU$35,000) to expand the concept into a full game. The campaign's success (AU$57,138 from 2,158 backers) validated the concept, enabling the team to commit to full-time development and eventually secure additional funding for scope expansion. The final product's quality and commercial success (over 3 million copies sold) demonstrated how crowdfunding can launch careers and studios from prototype foundations ⁹.

Best Practices

Establish Conservative Scopes with Buffer Timelines

Developers should define minimum viable products conservatively, treating stretch goals as genuine additions rather than core features, and establish timelines with built-in buffers of 1.5-2x initial estimates ¹¹¹. This practice prevents the credibility damage from repeated delays and scope creep that plague many campaigns.

Rationale: Underestimating development complexity represents the most common failure mode in Early Access and crowdfunding. Public development creates pressure to meet stated timelines, but rushing to meet unrealistic deadlines produces quality issues that damage reputation more severely than honest delays ⁷¹¹.

Implementation Example: When planning their Early Access launch, the developers of Slay the Spire identified core roguelike mechanics, three character classes, and 200 cards as their MVP—representing features they were confident delivering within six months. They privately planned for nine months of development, publicly committed to "approximately six months," and treated additional characters and cards as post-MVP additions. This conservative approach allowed them to meet and exceed expectations, building trust that sustained community engagement through the full Early Access period ⁶.

Maintain Regular Communication Cadence

Successful developers establish regular update schedules (weekly development blogs, monthly major updates) and maintain them consistently, including during challenging periods ¹⁵⁸. Transparency about setbacks generally preserves community goodwill better than silence or evasion.

Rationale: Community trust in Early Access and crowdfunding depends on visible progress and honest communication. Regular updates demonstrate active development, manage expectations, and transform backers from passive consumers into invested participants who tolerate challenges when kept informed ⁵¹¹.

Implementation Example: The Factorio development team published "Friday Facts" blog posts every single week for over seven years, totaling more than 360 detailed updates covering everything from technical optimizations to design philosophy debates. Even during difficult periods—such as when addressing performance issues that delayed features—they maintained the schedule, honestly discussing challenges and solutions. This consistency built exceptional community loyalty that sustained engagement through a multi-year Early Access period and contributed to the game's commercial and critical success ⁶.

Design Reward Tiers for Value and Feasibility

Crowdfunding reward structures should offer clear value differentiation while carefully analyzing fulfillment costs including manufacturing, shipping, and customs considerations ²³. Physical rewards particularly require detailed cost analysis to prevent fulfillment expenses consuming campaign funds.

Rationale: Poorly planned reward tiers can transform successful campaigns into financial disasters when fulfillment costs exceed projections. International shipping, customs fees, manufacturing minimums, and quality control all add expenses that inexperienced developers frequently underestimate ²⁷.

Implementation Example: Divinity: Original Sin 2's campaign structured tiers to emphasize digital rewards (game copies, digital soundtracks, artbooks) at lower levels where most backers concentrated, while limiting physical rewards (cloth maps, collector's boxes, physical manuals) to higher tiers with prices that genuinely covered production and shipping costs plus margin. They partnered with experienced fulfillment companies, obtained shipping quotes for major markets before setting prices, and built 20% contingency into physical tier pricing. This careful planning ensured fulfillment didn't compromise development budgets ⁸.

Implement Systematic Feedback Prioritization

Developers should establish clear frameworks for collecting, categorizing, and prioritizing community feedback, with transparent communication about implementation decisions ¹⁵. This transforms potentially overwhelming input volumes into actionable development priorities while managing community expectations.

Rationale: Early Access and crowdfunding generate massive feedback volumes that can overwhelm development teams or lead to design-by-committee problems. Systematic prioritization ensures valuable input gets implemented while maintaining creative vision and technical feasibility ¹¹¹.

Implementation Example: Hades developers created a structured feedback system categorizing input into bugs (immediate priority), balance issues (regular adjustment), quality-of-life improvements (evaluated for implementation effort versus impact), and feature requests (assessed against roadmap and vision). They maintained public Trello boards showing categorization and status, regularly explained why certain suggestions weren't implemented, and demonstrated implemented feedback in patch notes. This systematic approach extracted maximum value from community input while preventing scope creep ⁶.

Implementation Considerations

Platform Selection and Economics

Platform choice significantly impacts reach, revenue, and operational requirements ⁴¹⁰. Steam dominates PC Early Access with robust infrastructure, substantial audience reach, and established discovery mechanisms, but takes a 30% revenue share. Alternative platforms like itch.io offer flexibility and lower fees (developer-determined, often 10%) but provide less discovery support. Crowdfunding platforms each have distinct characteristics: Kickstarter provides credibility and traffic but charges 5% plus payment processing fees and operates all-or-nothing funding; Indiegogo offers flexible funding options; Fig provides equity crowdfunding but serves smaller audiences ²³.

Developers must evaluate platform economics holistically. A game generating $500,000 in Early Access sales on Steam yields $350,000 after platform fees, while the same sales on itch.io at 10% fees yield $450,000—but Steam's discovery mechanisms might generate 5-10x more sales volume, making the higher fee economically superior despite lower per-unit revenue. Similarly, Kickstarter's all-or-nothing model creates urgency that often drives higher funding but risks total failure if goals aren't met, while Indiegogo's flexible funding guarantees some capital but may reduce backer urgency ²¹⁰.

Audience-Specific Customization

Different player demographics respond to distinct messaging, reward structures, and engagement approaches ²³⁹. Traditional PC gamers on Kickstarter often seek innovation and nostalgia, responding well to campaigns emphasizing creative vision and genre revival. Investment-oriented audiences on platforms like Fig prioritize financial returns and development professionalism, requiring detailed budget breakdowns and revenue projections. Early Access purchasers on Steam expect playable content immediately, while crowdfunding backers accept longer timelines in exchange for deeper involvement.

Larian Studios customized their Divinity: Original Sin 2 Kickstarter campaign for traditional CRPG enthusiasts by emphasizing connections to classic titles like Baldur's Gate, featuring extensive gameplay systems descriptions, and offering reward tiers including physical items (cloth maps, collector's editions) that resonated with that demographic's collecting tendencies. Conversely, their Early Access messaging emphasized immediate playability and regular content updates, appealing to players wanting to experience development progression ⁸.

Development Stage and Readiness

The appropriate timing for Early Access or crowdfunding depends on development stage and team capabilities ¹¹¹. Crowdfunding typically occurs earlier, often with only prototypes or vertical slices, requiring strong conceptual communication and team credibility. Early Access requires more substantial development—functional core mechanics and sufficient content to justify purchase, typically 30-50% of planned features.

Teams must honestly assess readiness across multiple dimensions: technical stability (can builds be deployed reliably?), content sufficiency (is there enough gameplay to justify price?), community management capacity (can the team handle feedback volumes?), and development pipeline maturity (can regular updates be sustained?). Launching prematurely damages reputation and sales, while waiting too long misses funding opportunities and community building benefits ¹¹¹.

Legal and Financial Infrastructure

Proper legal and financial structures prove essential for managing tax implications, international transactions, and backer relationships ²³. Crowdfunding campaigns should clearly communicate that backers support development rather than purchasing products, managing expectations regarding delivery timelines and potential changes. This distinction affects consumer protection laws, refund obligations, and liability for non-delivery.

Tax implications of upfront revenue require professional guidance—crowdfunding proceeds may be taxable as income immediately despite representing future obligations, creating cash flow challenges. International backer management involves currency conversion, VAT/sales tax compliance across jurisdictions, and customs documentation for physical rewards. Intellectual property protection becomes critical when sharing development details publicly, requiring careful disclosure management ²³.

Common Challenges and Solutions

Challenge: Scope Creep and Feature Bloat

Ambitious stretch goals, community feature requests, and developer enthusiasm frequently expand project scopes beyond initial plans, extending timelines and budgets ⁷¹¹. This challenge proves particularly acute in crowdfunding, where stretch goals create obligations, and Early Access, where visible community desires create pressure for implementation. Scope creep damages credibility through delays, strains budgets, and can compromise core quality as resources spread across too many features.

Solution:

Establish clear scope boundaries distinguishing core features from enhancements, and treat stretch goals as genuine additions requiring proportional timeline and budget increases ¹⁸. Implement formal change control processes requiring explicit evaluation of any scope additions against timeline, budget, and quality impacts. Communicate scope decisions transparently, explaining why certain community requests won't be implemented to manage expectations.

Larian Studios addressed this challenge during Divinity: Original Sin 2 development by clearly categorizing features as "core" (essential for 1.0), "stretch goal" (funded by specific campaign targets), and "post-launch" (desirable but not committed). When community feedback suggested additional features, they evaluated each against this framework and publicly explained categorization decisions. Features not fitting core or funded stretch goals were explicitly deferred to post-launch updates, managing expectations while preserving development focus. This discipline enabled on-time delivery of a polished product that subsequently received additional content through updates and DLC ⁸.

Challenge: Community Management and Expectation Alignment

Public development creates diverse stakeholder groups with conflicting expectations, vocal criticism, and demands for attention that can overwhelm small teams ⁵¹¹. Negative community dynamics can create toxic environments affecting team morale and development focus. Balancing community input with creative vision while maintaining professional boundaries proves psychologically demanding, particularly for small indie teams unaccustomed to public scrutiny.

Solution:

Establish clear community guidelines, empower moderators to enforce standards, and maintain professional boundaries separating constructive feedback from personal attacks ¹⁵. Create structured feedback channels (dedicated forums, surveys, beta branches) that organize input productively rather than scattering it across social media. Develop communication protocols defining response expectations—not every comment requires developer response, but regular scheduled updates provide consistent engagement.

The Hades development team addressed this by establishing dedicated feedback channels in their Discord server with clear guidelines for constructive criticism, empowering community moderators to manage discussions, and maintaining regular developer presence through scheduled Q&A sessions rather than constant availability. They explicitly communicated that while all feedback was read, implementation decisions rested with the development team based on vision and feasibility. This structure extracted valuable community input while protecting developers from burnout and preserving creative control ⁶.

Challenge: Financial Planning and Cash Flow Management

Upfront revenue from Early Access or crowdfunding creates illusions of financial security that can lead to overspending, while extended development timelines deplete funds before completion ⁷¹⁰. Platform fees (5-10% for crowdfunding, 30% for digital distribution), reward fulfillment costs, taxes, and unexpected expenses frequently exceed initial estimates. Poor financial planning represents a primary cause of project failures and abandonments.

Solution:

Develop detailed budgets accounting for all costs including platform fees, taxes, reward fulfillment, marketing, and contingency reserves (minimum 20% of total budget) ²³. Implement milestone-based spending plans that pace expenditure against development progress rather than spending freely after funding success. Separate reward fulfillment budgets from development budgets to prevent fulfillment costs compromising development resources.

When Hollow Knight's Kickstarter raised AU$57,138, Team Cherry created a detailed budget allocating funds across development salaries, software licenses, audio production, marketing, and reward fulfillment, with 25% held as contingency. They established monthly spending limits based on projected development timeline, regularly reviewed actual spending against projections, and adjusted scope when necessary to maintain financial sustainability. When development extended beyond initial timelines, the contingency reserve and conservative spending enabled completion without additional funding rounds ⁹.

Challenge: Maintaining Development Momentum and Motivation

Extended public development periods (often 2-4 years for Early Access) create psychological challenges as initial enthusiasm wanes, criticism accumulates, and the finish line seems perpetually distant ¹¹. Team burnout, motivation loss, and the temptation to abandon challenging projects for new ideas represent significant risks. Public visibility makes these struggles more acute, as community expectations demand continued progress regardless of team morale.

Solution:

Establish sustainable development rhythms with realistic milestone spacing, celebrate incremental achievements publicly to maintain team and community morale, and build team resilience through regular breaks and workload management ¹⁵. Create internal milestone celebrations separate from public releases, maintaining team motivation through private achievements. Consider bringing additional team members or contractors for specific challenges to prevent burnout and maintain progress.

Factorio's development team maintained momentum through their multi-year Early Access period by establishing sustainable work rhythms (avoiding crunch), celebrating internal milestones regardless of public visibility, and rotating team members through different systems to prevent monotony. They publicly acknowledged difficult periods in their Friday Facts blog posts, humanizing the development process and building community empathy. This sustainable approach enabled them to maintain consistent progress and quality through a development period exceeding five years ⁶.

Challenge: Technical Debt and Quality Assurance

Rapid iteration and frequent updates characteristic of Early Access can accumulate technical debt—shortcuts and suboptimal implementations that enable quick feature delivery but create long-term maintenance burdens ¹¹. Balancing new feature development against technical debt repayment and quality assurance proves difficult when community expectations emphasize visible progress. Accumulated technical debt can eventually paralyze development or require expensive refactoring that delays completion.

Solution:

Allocate dedicated time in development schedules for technical debt repayment and quality assurance, typically 20-30% of each development cycle ¹¹¹. Communicate technical work transparently to communities, explaining how refactoring and optimization enable future features even when not immediately visible. Implement automated testing and continuous integration pipelines that catch regressions early, preventing quality degradation as complexity increases.

Slay the Spire developers addressed this by establishing a development rhythm alternating between feature updates and polish/optimization updates. Every 2-3 feature updates, they released a "stability and balance" update focused on bug fixes, performance optimization, and technical improvements. They communicated this rhythm clearly to the community, explaining how technical work enabled future features and improved experience quality. This disciplined approach maintained code quality throughout Early Access, enabling a smooth 1.0 transition and sustainable post-launch support ⁶.

References

1. Game Developer. (2023). Early Access: How to Do It Right. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/early-access-how-to-do-it-right
2. GamesIndustry.biz. (2023). How to Run a Successful Kickstarter Campaign. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/how-to-run-a-successful-kickstarter-campaign
3. Game Developer. (2023). Crowdfunding and the Game Industry: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/crowdfunding-and-the-game-industry-a-comprehensive-guide
4. VentureBeat. (2023). The State of Early Access on Steam. https://venturebeat.com/games/the-state-of-early-access-on-steam/
5. GamesIndustry.biz. (2023). The Evolution of Early Access and What It Means for Developers. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/the-evolution-of-early-access-and-what-it-means-for-developers
6. Polygon. (2020). Early Access Games: Steam Success Stories. https://www.polygon.com/features/2020/9/24/21453542/early-access-games-steam-success-stories
7. TechCrunch. (2019). Kickstarter Video Games Success Rate. https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/15/kickstarter-video-games-success-rate/
8. Game Developer. (2023). Postmortem: How Divinity Original Sin 2 Used Early Access and Crowdfunding. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/postmortem-how-divinity-original-sin-2-used-early-access-and-crowdfunding
9. GamesIndustry.biz. (2023). Kickstarter and the Games Industry: 10 Years On. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/kickstarter-and-the-games-industry-10-years-on
10. VentureBeat. (2023). How Indie Developers Are Using Early Access to Fund Development. https://venturebeat.com/games/how-indie-developers-are-using-early-access-to-fund-development/
11. Game Developer. (2023). The Risks and Rewards of Early Access Development. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/the-risks-and-rewards-of-early-access-development
12. Polygon. (2019). Steam Early Access Success and Failure Rate. https://www.polygon.com/2019/1/28/18200610/steam-early-access-success-failure-rate